France - 2012
ECtHR cases - decisions art.14 etc.
- Code:
- S8
- Key Area:
- Discrimination Statistics
- Strand(s):
- Statistics
| Short Answer |
In 2011 the ECHR examined 4 complaints relying on Article 14 of the Convention, but it concluded that there had been no violation of Article 14. |
| Qualitative Info |
In 2011 the ECHR examined 4 complaints relying on Article 14 of the Convention (Pascaud c. France, A.S.P.A.S. et Lasgrezas c. France, Stasi c. France, Fabris c. France), but it concluded that there had been no violation of Article 14. |
| Numbers of cases | |
| Exemplary cases | |
| Groups affected/interested | |
| Type (R/D) | |
| Key socio-economic / Institutional Areas | |
| External Url | |
| Situation(s) |
|
| Library |
|
| Short Answer |
In 2012 the ECHR examined 2 complaints relying on Article 14 of the Convention (Chabauty/France, Gas and Dubois/France), but it concluded that there had been no violation of Article 14. |
| Qualitative Info |
In 2012 the ECHR examined 2 complaints relying on Article 14 of the Convention (Chabauty/France, Gas and Dubois/France), but it concluded that there had been no violation of Article 14. |
| Numbers of cases | 2 |
| Exemplary cases | |
| Groups affected/interested | |
| Type (R/D) | |
| Key socio-economic / Institutional Areas | |
| External Url | http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-113715; http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-109571 |
| Situation(s) |
|
| Library |
|